Re: 64-bit hash function for hstore and citext data type

I wrote:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
>> I'm inclined to fix this in hstoreUpgrade rather than complicate
>> hstore_hash with historical trivia. Also there have been no field
>> complaints - I guess it's unlikely that there is much pg 8.4 hstore data
>> in the wild that anyone wants to hash.

> Changing hstoreUpgrade at this point seems like wasted/misguided effort.

Oh, cancel that --- I was having a momentary brain fade about how that
function is used.  I agree your proposal is sensible.

            regards, tom lane