Hi again,
I see a big problem here, if a sysadm first installs unixODBC, then
postgres-odbc, then update unixODBC, the symlink for libodbcpsql.so will
point to the latest version, i.e. version `2'. The postgresql has version
`0', and version `2' is older and less functional... This is very
confusing. Can we do anything about it? :(
/Palle
--On Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:52:52 +0100 Palle Girgensohn
<girgen@partitur.se> wrote:
> --On Monday, February 04, 2002 23:28:16 -0500 Peter Eisentraut
> <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> Palle Girgensohn writes:
>>
>>> I installed the unixODBC at 02:31, and postgres odbc at 03:11...
>>> (sic...), anyway, unixODBC apparently has support for postgresql built
>>> in. Which distribution should I use and recommend?
>>
>> The PostgreSQL ODBC driver has seen a lot of work since 7.1. At first
>> glance, it doesn't seem like unixODBC has merged up on those yet. The
>> version number choice is bogus and can be ignored.
>
> OK. I'm preparing the ports collection for FreeBSD, so I will have to add
> a note about this, I guess... This would be very confusing for users.
> Maybe we could bump the .so version number? Or perhaps, the unixODBC
> people be pursuaded to merge up?
>
> /Palle