Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 3/13/18 13:45, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah.  I'd written that off as too low-probability to worry about,
>> but maybe not.  I'll poke further.  Peter, which lcov did you test?

> lcov: LCOV version 1.13
> The one that comes with Debian stable, presumably the same that is
> running on coverage.p.o.

OK, now we're getting into the *really* low-probability cases.  Like,
maybe it's time to remove and reinstall lcov and/or gcc on that box?

            regards, tom lane