Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree with the argument in this thread, having "Source code" as part
> of \df+ is bit annoying, specifically when output involve some really
> big PL language functions. Having is separate does make \df+ output more
> readable. So I would vote for \df++ rather then adding the source code
> as part of footer for \df+.
If it's unreadable in \df+, how would \df++ make that any better?
regards, tom lane