Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Right. Here's the patch I just knocked up, which seems to Just Work (tm) ;-)
The main objection I can see to this is that you'd get a fairly
unhelpful message if you intended a conninfo string and there was
anything wrong with your syntax (eg, misspelled keyword). Maybe we
should go with the conn: bit, although really that doesn't seem any
less likely to collide with actual dbnames than the "does it contain
"="" idea. Anyone have other ideas how to disambiguate?
regards, tom lane