Re: pgbench--new transaction type

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pgbench--new transaction type
Дата
Msg-id 27590.1342403825@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgbench--new transaction type  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 1 June 2012 01:02, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry it has taken me a year to get back to this patch.  I have wanted
>> to use it, and to ask other people to run it and report their results,
>> several time recently, so I would like to get it into the core.

> Who marked this patch as rejected in the commitfest app? Why?

You don't think this bunch of database weenies would use an app without
a transaction log, I hope ;-).  If you go to the "activity log" (link
at the upper right) it shows that Heikki did the deed, at
2012-06-20 07:34:08.  The decision seems to have been taken in the
thread ending here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg01229.php
which I observe you participated in ...

> It would be nice if this information was automatically posted as a
> "comment". Surely if a patch is rejected, there should be at least a
> one-line explanation.

I suppose Heikki should have added a comment pointing to one or another
of those messages.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes