Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2755.1304020919@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I'm currently looking at a database which has some extreme bloating of
> intarray GiST indexes.  As in 1000% bloating in only a few months.  This
> is not a particularly high-transaction-rate database, so the bloating is
> a little surprising; I can only explain it if vacuum wasn't cleaning the
> indexes at all, and maybe not even then.
> We're currently instrumenting the database so that we can collect a bit
> more data on update activity, but in the meantime, has anyone seen
> anything like this?
1. What PG version?
2. If new enough to have contrib/pgstattuple, what does pgstattuple()  have to say about the index?
I'm suspicious that this might be bloat caused by a bad picksplit function,
not from having a lot of dead entries in the index.  We've fixed several
other bogus picksplit functions in contrib in the past.
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: