Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes
Дата
Msg-id 2755.1304020919@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I'm currently looking at a database which has some extreme bloating of
> intarray GiST indexes.  As in 1000% bloating in only a few months.  This
> is not a particularly high-transaction-rate database, so the bloating is
> a little surprising; I can only explain it if vacuum wasn't cleaning the
> indexes at all, and maybe not even then.

> We're currently instrumenting the database so that we can collect a bit
> more data on update activity, but in the meantime, has anyone seen
> anything like this?

1. What PG version?
2. If new enough to have contrib/pgstattuple, what does pgstattuple()  have to say about the index?

I'm suspicious that this might be bloat caused by a bad picksplit function,
not from having a lot of dead entries in the index.  We've fixed several
other bogus picksplit functions in contrib in the past.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: ALTER TYPE DROP + composite-typed col vs. pg_upgrade
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes