Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Дата
Msg-id 27536.1386102906@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Ответы Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Список pgsql-hackers
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> If we care about our performance on various operating systems it is
> _OUR_ responsibility to track that closely and automated and report back
> and only if that feedback loop fails to work we are actually in a real
> position to consider something as drastical as considering a platform
> "undependable" or looking into alternatives (like directIO).

+1.  I fail to understand why anyone would think it's a good idea for us
to build our own I/O stack.  The resources that would be consumed by that
would probably be enough to sink the project, or at least ensure that we
made no progress on any other aspect of the system for a good long time.
(And I'm just talking development, never mind maintenance.)

Far better to invest some effort in providing decent feedback to the
platforms we depend on.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical changeset generation v6.7
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing