Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 25.10.25 00:26, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> While hacking on this it seemed like a good idea to move to using progname
>> consistently, and reduce scope in some places from global variables, but
>> looking at it now I'm less convinced. At the very least it should be ripped
>> out into its own patch but for now those changes are left in there.
> The --version outputs intentionally do not use progname, so that you get
> a proper identification of the program and version independent of what
> the binary might be called. Please don't change that.
Hmm, that's important institutional knowledge that should be captured
somewhere.
regards, tom lane