Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Дата
Msg-id 2751aafc-8341-1c3d-c3e2-5abed914a6a4@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Список pgsql-hackers
On 11/26/17 06:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So attached are rebased patches:
>> - 0001 to introduce the connection parameter saslchannelbinding, which
>> allows libpq to enforce the type of channel binding used during an
>> exchange.
>> - 0002 to add tls-endpoint as channel binding type, which is where 0001 shines.
> 
> Attached is a rebased patch set, documentation failing to compile. I
> am moving at the same time this patch set to the next commit fest.

I think these are SCRAM channel bindings, not SASL channel bindings, so
the parameter should be named accordingly.

I also wonder whether there should be a mechanism to turn off channel
binding from the client.  Right now, there is no way to test the
non-PLUS mechanism in an SSL build.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows