Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Anyway, given that there's this one nonobvious gotcha, there might be
>> others. My recommendation is that we take this off the open-items list
>> for 8.2 and revisit it in the 8.3 cycle when there's more time.
> I wonder if Theo's recent reported problem with 4.3M child xids changes the
> calculus on this.
Yeah, I was just looking at that. Removing useless entries from the
child-xid list would presumably help him. Considering we're not even
formally in beta yet, I'm probably being too conservative to recommend
we not touch it.
regards, tom lane