Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> However, I'd like to think that we can do better than what's proposed
> in the patch. There are a couple of things to consider here:
> - Should the parameter be renamed to reflect that it should only be
> used for testing purposes?
-1 to that part, because it would break a bunch of buildfarm animals'
configurations. I doubt that any gain in clarity would be worth it.
> - Should we make more general the description of the developer options
> in the docs?
Perhaps ... what did you have in mind?
regards, tom lane