Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27374.1176744959@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch (Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED
patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
> Apart from making the patch a bit smaller again, checking only
> for 'i' still allows multiple SERIALs in the same table but lets
> disallowing multiple GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY.
> Thinking a bit about it, is it desired to disallow multiple GENERATED
> ALWAYS AS IDENTITY fields? It's just a twisted SERIAL anyway.
I don't see the value of disallowing it.
> Also, DROP IDENTITY is equivalent with SET DEFAULT
> nextval('owned_sequence') iff the field has an OWNED
> sequence and it was GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY before.
> Considering that SERIAL is a macro, and SET/DROP DEFAULT is allowed
> on IDENTITY/GENERATED columns per Tom's request,
> should I keep this statement?
If it's not in the spec I don't see any strong reason to have it...
> Also, the current grammar is made to give a syntax error
> if you say "colname type GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS ( expr )".
> But it makes the grammar unbalanced, and gives me:
> bison -y -d gram.y
> conflicts: 2 shift/reduce
You'll have to fix that. Usually you can get around it by making the
grammar a bit more verbose --- if you were trying to avoid duplication
by means of optional productions, don't do that.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: