Re: linking hba.c
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: linking hba.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27282.998781506@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | linking hba.c (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: linking hba.c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> In trying to decide how to keep ODBC compilable standalone, I can't
> figure out how to get md5.c in there from backend/libpq.
AFAIK ODBC hasn't been compilable standalone for awhile; doesn't it
depend on our toplevel configure script now?
> Is it crazy to
> put md5.c in interfaces/odbc and symlink it from there to backend/libpq
> and interfaces/libpq?
YES, that's crazy. If you think ODBC should build separately, then give
it its own copy of md5.c. But please first check that your assumption
is still valid.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: