Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck
| От | Antonin Houska |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2728.1423693235@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> writes: > > The special case is that the path passed to add_path_precheck() has costs > > *equal to* those of the old_path. If pathkeys, outer rells and costs are the > > same, as summarized in the comment above, I expect add_path_precheck() to > > return false. Do I misread anything? > > It does, so I don't see your point? Just that pre-check is - in this special (and very rare?) case - more stringent than the proper check would be. -- Antonin Houska Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: