Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps
Дата
Msg-id 27269.1241642616@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> ...  Maybe we should make that
> setting PGC_POSTMASTER (or just get rid of it?),

Another thought here: if we do get persuaded that the regex_flavor GUC
has to stay, we could eliminate it as a hazard for planning by changing
its scope to PGC_BACKEND.  That would be much less restrictive than
PGC_POSTMASTER; for instance it'd still work to set it for a particular
application via ALTER ROLE.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: text_pattern_ops and complex regexps