-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I agree. The stuff is certainly accessible in PG-specific tables, so
> the argument that we are missing functionality doesn't hold any water
> IMHO. The question is whether we have to keep information_schema
> pristine. I think that you and Stephan have made enough concrete
> points that the answer to that has to be "stick to the standard".
If there is that much clamor for this, why not make a new schema,
such as "pginformation_schema" People could then tweak the views
to their heart's content, while keeping 100% compliance.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200407012226
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFA5MfzvJuQZxSWSsgRAmyaAKCjbKre5ZuDpJnVA6rGjnAgNaIwvACgvRJN
VxhiNWiYUCW8AfUBOUd/vEw=
=SUM9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----