Re: Unicode combining characters

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Unicode combining characters
Дата
Msg-id 27049.1002120964@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Unicode combining characters  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Unicode combining characters  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Unicode combining characters  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> ... There seems some problems existing in the
> implementation. Considering REGEX is not so slow, maybe we should
> employ the same design as REGEX. i.e. using wide charcters, not
> multibyte streams...

Seems like a good thing to put on the to-do list.  In the meantime,
we still have the question of whether to enable multibyte in the
default configuration.  I'd still vote YES, as these results seem
to me to demonstrate that there is no wide-ranging performance penalty.
A problem confined to LIKE on long strings isn't a showstopper IMHO.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: btree_gist regression test busted?
Следующее
От: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unicode combining characters