Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
От | Ronan Dunklau |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2700884.mvXUDI8C0e@aivenlaptop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers) (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le vendredi 13 octobre 2023, 22:32:13 CEST Thomas Munro a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:31 PM Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io> wrote: > > Le mercredi 11 octobre 2023, 10:59:50 CEST Thomas Munro a écrit : > > > The back-patch to 12 was a little trickier than anticipated, but after > > > taking a break and trying again I now have PG 12...17 patches that > > > I've tested against LLVM 10...18 (that's 54 combinations), in every > > > case only with the clang corresponding to LLVM. > > > > Thank you Thomas for those patches, and the extensive testing, I will run > > my own and let you know. > > Thanks! No news is good news, I hope? I'm hoping to commit this today. > > > > I've attached only the patches for master, but the 12-16 versions are > > > available at https://github.com/macdice/postgres/tree/llvm16-$N in > > > case anyone has comments on those. > > > > For PG13 and PG12, it looks like the ExecEvalBoolSubroutineTemplate is not > > used anywhere, as ExecEvalBoolSubroutine was introduced in PG14 if I'm not > > mistaken. > > Right, looks like I can remove that in those branches. Oh sorry I thought I followed up. I ran the same stress testing involving several hours of sqlsmith with all jit costs set to zero and didn't notice anything with LLVM16. Thank you ! -- Ronan Dunklau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: