Re: Not understanding this behavior of a subselect + volatile function

On May 26, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:

> I'd be inclined to treat it like C and avoid referencing and
> altering a variable in one expression (eg arr[i++]=i; is a bad idea).

I agree, we're already working on changing it to a two-step process where we select f1(), and then select * where a =
$a. I'm still really curious about what's going on here though. Thanks for the insight! 

-- Brian