Re: Have we out-grown Flex?

Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Quite apart from the practical difficulties that we have with Flex
> (the fact that the authors are non-responsive and possibly retired,

btw, as far as that goes, a look into their sourceforge SCM shows
evidence of continued activity.  I dunno why it's been so long since
their last formal release, but they're not dead.

> that annoying compiler warning,

http://flex.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flex/flex/flex.skl?r1=2.213&r2=2.214
        regards, tom lane