Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:51:40PM +0100, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> I'll have a discussion about new materialized_view object class
>> on selinux list soon, then I'll submit a patch towards contrib/sepgsql
>> according to the consensus here.
> Has this progressed?
> Should we consider this a 9.3 release blocker? sepgsql already has a red box
> warning about its limitations, so adding the limitation that materialized
> views are unrestricted wouldn't be out of the question.
Definitely -1 for considering it a release blocker. If KaiGai-san can
come up with a fix before we otherwise would release 9.3, that's great,
but there's no way that sepgsql has a large enough user community to
justify letting it determine the release schedule.
regards, tom lane