Re: I am done
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: I am done |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26805.1031146559@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: I am done (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: I am done
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> Does anyone else have an opinion on this? If not, I will implement it per
> Bruce's commentary.
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I think the second, passing an arg to say whether it is server or
>> client, will do the trick, though now you need an error one too. I
>> guess you have to use #define and set it, or pass a string down with the
>> GUC variable and test that with strcmp.
I think you're going to end up un-merging the routines. There is no way
to pass an extra parameter to the set/check routines (at least not
without uglifying all the rest of the GUC code). The design premise is
that the per-variable hook routines know what they're supposed to do,
and in that case this means one hook for each variable.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: