Re: semaphore usage "port based"?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: semaphore usage "port based"?
Дата
Msg-id 26796.1144028094@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: semaphore usage "port based"?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: semaphore usage "port based"?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, could we see strace (or whatever BSD calls it) output for the second
>> postmaster?  I'd like to see exactly what results it's getting for the
>> kernel calls it makes during IpcSemaphoreCreate.

> 'k, dont' know what strace is ... we have ktrace and truss ... truss is 
> what I usually use, and is:

truss seems to have an output format closer to what I'm used to, but
either will do.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Следующее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL Bypass for indexes