Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes

31.03.2023 15:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> See also the thread about bug #16329 [1].  Alexander promised to look
> into improving the test coverage in this area, maybe he can keep an
> eye on the WAL logic coverage too.

Yes, I'm going to analyze that area too. Maybe it'll take more time
(a week or two) if I encounter some bugs there (for now I observe anomalies
with gist__int_ops), but I will definitely try to improve the gist testing.

Best regards,
Alexander