Re: starting out
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: starting out |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26755.1044985398@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: starting out (Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net> writes:
> Well, this isn't exactly what I wanted, but it gets me rolling and
> confirms I pinpointed the problem in OpenSSL. I really want it to
> reference the major version number. But that is version 0, not 2
> as Redhat seems to have.
[looks at rpm specfile...] No, the reason Red Hat is using 2 is that
the openssl boys have repeatedly broken binary compatibility without
incrementing their major version number as they ought. At the moment
I find in the Rawhide version
# For the curious:
# 0.9.5a soversion = 0
# 0.9.6 soversion = 1
# 0.9.6a soversion = 2
# 0.9.6c soversion = 3
# 0.9.7 soversion = 4
%define soversion 4
If you are concerned about making the .so version number actually
useful, I recommend you follow Red Hat's lead.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: