Re: Questions regarding interaction of stored functions and transactions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Questions regarding interaction of stored functions and transactions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26733.1111677140@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Questions regarding interaction of stored functions and transactions (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Questions regarding interaction of stored functions
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> writes:
> Let's take the following fictional scenerio:
> BEGIN;
> INSERT INTO table1 VALUES ('somestring');
> INSERT INTO table1 VALUES ('anotherstring');
> SELECT user_defined_function();
> COMMIT;
> In this case, user_defined_function() does a lot more table manipulation.
> I don't want that to be done if any statement prior fails, but it seems as
> if it's always done, regardless. It seems as if the second INSERT is not
> executed if the first fails, but the function is always called.
Sorry, I don't believe a word of that. If the first insert fails,
everything will be rejected until COMMIT.
Possibly you need to show a less fictionalized version of your problem.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: