Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again
Дата
Msg-id 26721.920503912@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again  (James Thompson <jamest@math.ksu.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     What I'm in doubt about is, why (if) we don't want to install
>     mcxt.h?   It  is  required  (since  my changes) by every user
>     built backend-loadable module. So it should be installed.

If it's only mcxt.h that is newly required, we may as well just export
it and be done with it.  My recollection of the original report was
that *several* formerly backend-private headers needed to be added to
the export set, and I thought that wasn't a very good idea...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Tom Lane's fixes in v6.4.3
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c'