Re: IN subquery not using a hash
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: IN subquery not using a hash |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26716.1121904257@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | IN subquery not using a hash (Paul Tillotson <spam1011@adelphia.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: IN subquery not using a hash
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Paul Tillotson <spam1011@adelphia.net> writes:
> For the following query, postgres is running the IN subquery over and
> over again (once for each row scanned in the parent table.)
> I would have expected it to run the whole query once and create a hash
> which would then be probed once for every row scanned in the parent
> table. I assumed that it was not doing so because it thought that the
> resulting hash table would exceed sort_mem,
Hardly likely, considering it's estimating only 296 rows in the subquery
output. My bet is that you've chosen a datatype whose comparisons are
not hashable (like char(n)). What is the datatype of parentid in these
tables, anyway?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: