Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns
Дата
Msg-id
26706.1268862469@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
"Kevin Grittner"  writes:
> Tom Lane  wrote:
>> The current column ordering can be rationalized to some extent as
>> 
>> 1. identity info (user id, db id, application name)
>> 2. current query info
>> 3. session info (backend start time, client addr/port)
> OK.  I guess that trumps my idea, although it would sure be nice if
> it were possible to swap 2 and 3 so that we could put the query text
> at the end.

Well, the current ordering is definitely historical rather than
designed, but I'm hesitant to do more than minor tweaking.  Even if we
think/hope it won't break applications, people are probably used to
seeing a particular ordering.

I'm not necessarily dead set against it though.  I guess if we were
to do what you suggest, we'd end up with

identity:datid            | oid                      | datname          | name                     | procpid          | integer                  | usesysid         | oid                      | usename          | name                     | application_name | text                     | 
session:client_addr      | inet                     | client_port      | integer                  | backend_start    | timestamp with time zone | 
transaction:xact_start       | timestamp with time zone | 
query:query_start      | timestamp with time zone | waiting          | boolean                  | current_query    | text                     | 

or possibly that plus relocate procpid somewhere else.  Anyone think
this is sufficiently better to justify possible confusion?
		regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
От: David Fetter
Дата:
FAQ