Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns
Дата
Msg-id
26706.1268862469@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns (Kevin Grittner)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
"Kevin Grittner" writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The current column ordering can be rationalized to some extent as >> >> 1. identity info (user id, db id, application name) >> 2. current query info >> 3. session info (backend start time, client addr/port) > OK. I guess that trumps my idea, although it would sure be nice if > it were possible to swap 2 and 3 so that we could put the query text > at the end. Well, the current ordering is definitely historical rather than designed, but I'm hesitant to do more than minor tweaking. Even if we think/hope it won't break applications, people are probably used to seeing a particular ordering. I'm not necessarily dead set against it though. I guess if we were to do what you suggest, we'd end up with identity:datid | oid | datname | name | procpid | integer | usesysid | oid | usename | name | application_name | text | session:client_addr | inet | client_port | integer | backend_start | timestamp with time zone | transaction:xact_start | timestamp with time zone | query:query_start | timestamp with time zone | waiting | boolean | current_query | text | or possibly that plus relocate procpid somewhere else. Anyone think this is sufficiently better to justify possible confusion? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления