Re: assume availability of "inline" keyword
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: assume availability of "inline" keyword |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2670103.1771528773@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | assume availability of "inline" keyword (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: assume availability of "inline" keyword
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> I noticed some code that uses __inline__ (which IIUC is a gcc extension) as
> well as a related configure check. "inline" was first added to C99, and we
> now require C11, so we can just assume it's there, right? FWIW it looks
> like meson builds don't bother checking this.
All those usages are guarded by
#if defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__INTEL_COMPILER)
so we are only concerned with gcc-alikes, which reduces the risks
of trouble. However, I have a vague recollection that it is/was
possible to put gcc in a mode where it only takes __inline__
not inline. This is likely something you get from -std=c90 or
thereabouts, which would be irrelevant now. But I'd suggest
checking it's okay under -std=c11 (not gnu11), just to be sure.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: