Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below
>> it, too.  The RFC references are probably useful and stable, and maybe
>> the wikipedia ref is OK, but I have little faith in either the
>> stability or the long-term relevance of the other two links.

> Not even those are all that stable, while the RFCs' in question haven't been
> replaced they have all been updated with new RFC's which we don't link to.  I
> think we are better off removing them as well and leaving reading up on
> security/crypto subject an exercise for the reader.

Good point.  Nuking both lists works for me.

            regards, tom lane