Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?
Дата
Msg-id
26695.1086356633@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian  writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What happens in a pg_dump -Fc / pg_restore scenario?

> So, in non-ascii format, I need to dump a comment record and read it
> back on restore?  Yuck.  Anyone want to tackle that?

Yes.  Hacking the output routines alone is almost never the right way
to do things in pg_dump.

My feeling is that if anyone cares to tackle this, it would be
appropriate to add a record type that carries a user-supplied
comment, and then people could do something like
	pg_dump --comment "generated on `date`"
if they want to have a timestamp.  I don't want a timestamp put
into the file by default, because that creates problems for
comparing dump files.

			regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
FAQ