Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26695.1086356633@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> What happens in a pg_dump -Fc / pg_restore scenario? > So, in non-ascii format, I need to dump a comment record and read it > back on restore? Yuck. Anyone want to tackle that? Yes. Hacking the output routines alone is almost never the right way to do things in pg_dump. My feeling is that if anyone cares to tackle this, it would be appropriate to add a record type that carries a user-supplied comment, and then people could do something like pg_dump --comment "generated on `date`" if they want to have a timestamp. I don't want a timestamp put into the file by default, because that creates problems for comparing dump files. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: