Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Дата
Msg-id 26601.1217273366@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> ISTM that Tom's objection is really that citext is a hack, and that it 
> will actually make it harder for us to get to a collation-based case 
> insensitive comparison.

Well, it won't make it harder to implement collations; but I worry that
people who have been relying on the citext syntax will have a hard time
migrating to collations.  Perhaps if someone did the legwork to
determine exactly what that conversion would look like, it would assuage
the fear.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?