Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Clean up generation of default

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Clean up generation of default
Дата
Msg-id 26591.1087062248@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Clean up generation of default  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Ответы Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Clean up generation of  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> OK, attached is a file with the original function, and an overloaded one 
> that just takes table and column.  It searches your current search_path 
> to find the first matching table.

The right way to do this at the C level would be to use the same
infrastructure as nextval() does to accept arguments like 'foo' and
'"Foo"."Bar"'.  There's no reason to restrict the two-argument form
to the current search_path.

Given that you do that, I'm not sure that a three-argument form is even
needed.  AFAIR no one has asked for a two-argument form of nextval...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: File leak?