Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Barring making a fourth GUC variable to control them (which seems like
>> overkill), I think it's a reasonably sane definition to say "we count
>> these if any stats are being collected". Doing what you propose would
>> simply expose an irrelevant implementation detail to users.
> OK. Don't we need to document this somewhere?
No objection to that. Probably section 24.2.1 is a reasonable place?
regards, tom lane