David Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> "so that the principle that <quote><token>CASE</token>
> does not evaluate any subexpressions that are not needed to determine
> the result</quote> is not ironclad."
> so the principle that [...] only evaluates necessary subexpressions is not
> ironclad.
OK, done that way.
> The problem with your example is that the following does not error:
> SELECT CASE WHEN false THEN 1/0 ELSE 1 END;
That's why that isn't the example ;-). In this case, since the WHEN is a
constant, the constant-expression simplifier itself figures out that it
can throw away the THEN expression and replace the whole CASE with the
ELSE expression. So it doesn't bother const-simplifying the THEN, hence
no error.
> While it is a great word I don't really believe "panacea" is good for our
> documentation given the diverse English language experiences of its readers.
Hm. "cure-all" maybe?
> "the values of function parameters" == "function arguments" ... though not
> everyone is fully aware (or remembers) the difference between arguments and
> parameters.
OK.
> "Thus for example in [...] functions..." -> Therefore, in [...] functions
> it is more reliable to use an [...] statement to protect a risky [...]
> statement compared to using a nested CASE expression.
Meh. The same principle applies in other languages too, so I don't think
your wording is an improvement.
regards, tom lane