Re: Use pg_current_xact_id() instead of deprecated txid_current()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Use pg_current_xact_id() instead of deprecated txid_current()
Дата
Msg-id 2645118.1770567884@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение
Ответ на Re: Use pg_current_xact_id() instead of deprecated txid_current()  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
Ответы Re: Use pg_current_xact_id() instead of deprecated txid_current()
Список pgsql-hackers
=?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= <alvherre@kurilemu.de> writes:
> On 2026-02-08, Shinya Kato wrote:
>> Since pg_current_xact_id() returns xid8 which does not support
>> arithmetic operators, places that need "xid + 1" cast the result via
>> ::text::bigint first.

> I think it may be better to add some operators, or was there a rationale for these not being there?

I'm fairly concerned about overloading the arithmetic operators with
unsigned versions.  The reason we never invented SQL-level uint8 and
such is fear of getting a lot of "ambiguous operator" errors.  Now,
if we are careful not to create implicit casts between xid[8] and
any ordinary type, maybe it'd be okay to invent xid+int, xid8-int,
and a few more.

As things stand, I don't find the proposed patch to be an improvement.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: