Re: Small fix for inv_getsize

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Small fix for inv_getsize
Дата
Msg-id 26386.973192742@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Small fix for inv_getsize  (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>)
Ответы Re: Small fix for inv_getsize  (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> writes:
> you wrote. Except VARATT_IS_EXTENDED check (is it neccessary, can I store
> data and be sure that it is not toasted? I do not like this for BLOBs).

Yes, it's necessary *and* appropriate.  LO data won't be moved off,
because pg_largeobject doesn't have a toast table (unless the user makes
one), but it can be compressed.

> All other seems the same... Please give me an example of this check...

The loop only has to loop till it finds a valid tuple.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Denis Perchine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Small fix for inv_getsize
Следующее
От: Denis Perchine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Small fix for inv_getsize