Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26306.1223928219@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM
stuff
Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Two different buildfarm machines are currently showing the same failure:
> ERROR: could not fsync segment 0 of relation 1663/16384/29270/1: No such file or directory
> ERROR: checkpoint request failed
Some tests show that when the serial regression tests are run in a
freshly initdb'd installation, HEAD assigns OID 29270 to "bmscantest"
in the bitmapops test. So that's been dropped some time before the
failure occurs; which means that this isn't a narrow-window race
condition; which raises the question of why we're not seeing it on more
machines. I notice now that kudu and dragonfly are actually the same
machine ... could this be an OS-specific problem? Kris, has there been
any system-software change on that machine recently?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: