Re: libpq compression

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: libpq compression
Дата
Msg-id 26283.1339947738@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: libpq compression  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: libpq compression  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: libpq compression  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Is there a reason why we don't have a parameter on the client
> mirroring ssl_ciphers?

Dunno, do we need one?  I am not sure what the cipher negotiation process
looks like or which side has the freedom to choose.

> That, or just have DEFAULT as being the default (which in current
> openssl means ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL.

If our default isn't the same as the underlying default, I have to
question why not.  But are you sure this "!" notation will work with
all openssl versions?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Broken system timekeeping breaks the stats collector
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq compression