Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Дата
Msg-id 26248.1297552363@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Ответы Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Feb 12, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I did think of another idea besides forbidding dash in extension names:
>> what if we use double dash as the name/version separator,

> +1 You might even consider mandating a double-dash between versions, so that they could have dashes:
>         extension--oldversion--newversion.sql

Hm.  I think we'd still have to disallow dash as the first or last
character in a version name to make that unambiguous.  Not sure it's
worth the trouble.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling