Re: refactoring comment.c
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: refactoring comment.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26245.1282246463@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: refactoring comment.c (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: refactoring comment.c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Any other kibitzing before I commit this?
Sure ...
+ * If the object is a relation or a child object of a relation (e.g. an
+ * attribute or contraint, *relp will set to point to that relation). This
Parenthesis in the wrong place here, grammar and spelling not much better.
Also, I still feel that this comment could do better about explaining the
behavior, particularly with respect to locking. Perhaps say
+ * If the target object is a relation or a child object of a relation
+ * (e.g. an attribute or constraint), the relation is also opened, and *relp
+ * receives the open relcache entry pointer; otherwise *relp is set to NULL.
+ * This is a bit grotty but it makes life simpler, since the caller will
+ * typically need the relcache entry too. Caller must close the relcache
+ * entry when done with it. The relation is locked with the specified
+ * lockmode if the target object is the relation itself or an attribute,
+ * but for other child objects, only AccessShareLock is acquired on the
+ * relation.
+ ScanKeyInit(&skey[0], ObjectIdAttributeNumber, BTEqualStrategyNumber,
+ F_OIDEQ, ObjectIdGetDatum(address.objectId));
There's a standard convention for the layout of ScanKeyInit calls, and
this isn't it. Trivial, I know, but it's better to make similar code
look similar.
There's no longer any need for a diff in src/backend/parser/Makefile.
+ #define OBJECTADDRESS_H
+
+ #include "nodes/parsenodes.h"
+ #include "nodes/pg_list.h"
+ #include "storage/lock.h"
+ #include "utils/rel.h"
You shouldn't need pg_list.h here, as parsenodes.h surely includes it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: