Re: Vacuum and oldest xmin (again)

Kuba Ouhrabka <kuba@comgate.cz> writes:
> The problem is fully described in thread I mentioned earlier, Tom's 
> excellent explanation can be found here:
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=cs&lr=&frame=right&th=5227028cb3449572&seekm=11390.1080964720%40sss.pgh.pa.us#link14

Oh, that thing.  Well, my opinion has not changed since April --- I
don't think the problem justifies slowing down every transaction start.
        regards, tom lane