Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26221.1043285844@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE
Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
> Adds in NO MAXVALUE and NO MINVALUE options for create sequence per 200X
> spec, which will also make alter sequence a touch easier.
What are these supposed to do exactly? There is no such animal as a
sequence that hasn't got a maxvalue, nor one without a minvalue.
"Large" does not mean "unlimited".
I'm not eager to pick up evidently-poorly-thought-out features from a
draft spec that is nowhere near being frozen. Anyway, didn't we decide
that converging syntax with 200X was a bad idea if we weren't going to
converge semantics?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: