Re: CF app feature request

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: CF app feature request
Дата
Msg-id 26198.1542737961@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CF app feature request  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: CF app feature request  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: CF app feature request  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> I'm trying to figure out where this thread left off :) My understanding of
> the consensus is we don't actually want/need a change in the app, but are
> instead OK with the admin just handling it a somewhat ugly way in the few
> cases where it's necessary?

The original case (just a mistakenly duplicated entry) seems OK to solve
with a quick DELETE on the underlying table.

> Or is the consensus to add a "Withdrawn" status, just to solve a slightly
> different problem from the one that started this thread?

I think there is a use-case for "Withdrawn", it's more polite than
"Rejected" ;-).  But it's not a very high-priority request.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Connection slots reserved for replication
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CF app feature request