Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:41:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>>> This has been committed just after beta1 has been stamped.  So it
>>> means that it won't be included in it, right?

>> Right.

> Still, wouldn't it be better to wait until the version is tagged?

Yeah, that would have been better per project protocol: if a tarball
re-wrap becomes necessary then it would be messy not to include this
change along with fixing whatever urgent bug there might be.

However, I thought the case for delaying this fix till post-wrap was kind
of thin anyway, so if that does happen I won't be too fussed about it.
Otherwise I would've said something earlier on this thread.

            regards, tom lane