Re: More WITH
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: More WITH |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26180.1439833266@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: More WITH (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: More WITH
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Would be tricky. We don't currently have any way to wrap an EXPLAIN in
>> any larger statement, do we? Would be very useful for automated query
>> analysis, though.
> No. In the grammar, ExplainStmt expects the EXPLAIN to be at the
> top-level. Having it work any other way would require significant
> refactoring.
You can use EXPLAIN as the source of rows in a plpgsql FOR-over-query
loop, so there's a workaround available that way when you need to read
EXPLAIN output programmatically. I'm not convinced there's sufficient
value in trying to make EXPLAIN a full-fledged subquery otherwise.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: