Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views
Дата
Msg-id 26146.1389280771@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> My first thought was that it should just preprocess any security
> barrier quals in subquery_planner() in the same way as other quals are
> preprocessed. But thinking about it further, those quals are destined
> to become the quals of subqueries in the range table, so we don't
> actually want to preprocess them at that stage --- that will happen
> later when the new subquery is planned by recursion back into
> subquery_planner(). So I think the right answer is to make
> adjust_appendrel_attrs() handle recursion into sublink subqueries.

TBH, this sounds like doubling down on a wrong design choice.  I see
no good reason that updatable security views should require any
fundamental rearrangements of the order of operations in the planner;
and I doubt that this is the last bug you'll have if you insist on
doing that.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "MauMau"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] Archive recovery failure on 9.3+.