Re: Improving compressibility of WAL files

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote: 
>> I thought at one point that the direction this was going toward was to 
>> provide the size of the WAL file as a parameter you can use in the 
>> archive_command:
> Hard to beat for performance.  I thought there was some technical
> snag.
Yeah: the archiver process doesn't have that information available.
        regards, tom lane